Frank Weyer, an inventor and patent attorney based in Beverly Hills, announced today that he has filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Harley-Davidson Motor Company for infingment
of U.S. Patent No. 5,975,728 entitled Method and Apparatus for Providing User Selectable Multi-Color Automobile Instrument Panel Illumination. The patent covers a system for providing
user-selectable multi-color lighting to instrument panel instruments such as speedometers and tachometers. According to the complaint filed by Weyer in the U.S. District Court for the
Central District of California (Civil Action No. CV-07-2502 DDP(Ex)), Harley-Davidson is infringing Weyer'ss patent by selling its Model Nos. 74676-07 and 74677-07 combination
speedometer/tachomethers incorporating color matched lighting that are available as a $499 option on certain 2007 model year Harleys.
Harley-Davidson is not the first company sued by Weyer under his patent. Two years ago, Weyer sued Ford Motor Company in the same court for infringing his patent for offering the MyColor
multi-color instrument lighting option in Ford'ss then newly introduced 2005 Ford Mustang (Civil Action No. 04-08630 CBM). After Weyer filed a motion for a preliminary injunction, Ford
agreed to take a license under the patent. The terms of the Ford license are confidential.
Weyer says he intends to use the same strategy he used against Ford in his new suit against Harley-Davidson. It'ss unfortunate that large companies such as Ford and Harley seem to think
they have a right to use other people'ss patented technology at will, especially if the patents are owned by individual inventors. Fortunately, I'sm a practicing patent attorney and
litigator, so I can take legal action and am not at all impressed by litigation tactics of large companies and large law firms. Unfortunately, that is not the case for most small
inventors, who often cannot afford to go up against large companies to enforce their patents.
On the other hand, Weyer is also not looking for a windfall. On the other side, there are plaintiffs, not so much in the patent area, but especially in products liability, personal
injury, and medical malpractice cases, who look at lawsuits as a way to win a lottery, and seek exaggerated damages for sometimes trumped up complaints. Weyer says that that is not the
case here. All I am looking for is reasonable compensation for use of my patented technology. However, if my opponent refuses to be reasonable, then I will take whatever action is
necessary to enforce my rights. And the more force I have expended, the more expensive reasonable compensation becomes.
In the Ford lawsuit, Ford decided to take a patent license early in the litigation. Weyer says it would probably be to Harley'ss benefit to do the same. Patent litigation is extremely
expensive, especially if large law firms are involved. 'sRunning rates's of $50,000 to $100,000 a month or more are not at all uncommon. Although law firms like litigation and the
attorneys's fees that are generated, for companies and stockholders, lawsuits are bottomless money pits. There are usually two opportunities to settle lawsuits: at the very beginning, and
at the very end, just before trial. The smart choice, when faced with a meritorious complaint, is to settle early. Ford was smart. It will be interesting to see whether Harley is, as
well.