↑ Grab this Headline Animator

FTC Issues Critical and Rare Advisory Opinion to ACAInternational...

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC), for only the fourth time in its history, recently released an important advisory opinion to ACA International (http://www.acainternational.org/) clarifying a conflict between the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) and the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA).

Watch the video here (http://www.youtube.com/watchv=IdwS5pCzb3Q).

Were delighted to have received this rare advisory opinion from the FTC clarifying a critical matter to ACAs membership, said Valerie Hayes, ACA Internationals Vice President of Legal, Compliance and Government Affairs. It'ss a testament to the dedication and ongoing advocacy efforts of our members to ensure that key policymakers, regulators and legislators are hearing - and responding - to our concerns.

The complete advisory opinion (http://www.acainternational.org/files.aspxp=/images/14382/p064803-ftc-advisory-opinion.pdf) from the FTC is available on ACAs Web site (http://www.acainternational.org/files.aspxp=/images/14382/p064803-ftc-advisory-opinion.pdf).

ACA International is also hosting a teleseminar (http://www.acainternational.org/files.aspxp=/images/13128/datafurnishingregform.pdf) on July 9, 2009 to discuss how the new direct dispute and accuracy and integrity rules affect the credit and collection industry.

The FTC states in its opinion a debt collector does not violate 's167; 805(c) of the FDCPA, which prohibits a debt collector from communicating with a consumer after receiving a written request to cease communications except under certain circumstances, if the consumer directly disputes information in his or her consumer report after sending the cease communication request, and the debt collector informs the consumer of the results of its investigation.

In December 2007, federal agencies with authority to promulgate rules and regulations implementing the FCRA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking regarding the accuracy and integrity of information furnished to consumer reporting agencies (CRAs) and the circumstances under which a data furnisher is required to investigate a direct dispute from a consumer concerning the accuracy of information contained in his or her consumer report.

ACA submitted comments in February 2008 in response to the proposed rule, and among other things, specifically requested the rule make two clarifications. First, the rule should clarify the act of responding to a consumer dispute is not an attempt to collect a debt under the FDCPA. Second, the rule should clarify a consumer who requests a debt collector cease communication under 's167; 805(c) of the FDCPA, but subsequently sends the collector notice disputing information in his or her consumer report, has revoked his or her cease communication request for purpose of allowing the debt collector to respond to the consumers notice of dispute.

With the imminent release by the agencies of the final rule concerning the above-described obligations of data furnishers under the FCRA, the FTC released its advisory opinion addressing ACAs concerns over the statutory conflict between the FDCPA and FCRA.

The FTC states in its opinion that if a consumer directly disputes information in his or her consumer report with a debt collector after sending a written cease communication request to the collector, the debt collector does not violate 's167; 805(c) of the FDCPA if the collectors communication to the consumer is solely to inform the consumer of the result of the debt collectors investigation or to inform the consumer his or her dispute is frivolous or irrelevant in compliance with the rules under the FCRA.

MORE INFORMATION:

John Nemo, Public Relations Director, ACA International

(952) 928-8000, ext. 124

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

---

This article has been robotically scanned and tagged by Prnewsnow with the following search tags. No human manipulation of these tags take place.
| " | " Lari | |

---

4948 readers online...

, Local News