Bolstered by a series of delays granted by the SEC and highly publicized criticism of Sarbanes-Oxley legislation, many smaller companies are playing the waiting game with Section 404
compliance. Rumors are circulating about the possibility of a last-minute pardon. In light of this, it makes sense to separate fact from fiction. This is especially important as the 2007
deadline for compliance draws near.
It is a fact that larger companies, so-called large-accelerated and accelerated filers, are experiencing dramatically high costs. One university study estimates that the worldwide, direct
and indirect costs in the first year of enforcement cost over $1 trillion dollars. It is also fact that the SEC publicly acknowledged the extreme cost of compliance experienced by large
companies and granted delays to smaller public companies (a.k.a. non-accelerated filers).
Critics of the legislation say that SOX increases operating costs, thus making US companies less competitive. Indeed, some companies have tried to avoid SOX compliance altogether by
listing their stock on foreign exchanges with looser rules such as the London Stock Exchange'ss Alternative Investment Market (AIM). Other companies are taking SOX to court by arguing
that the PCAOB (accounting rulemaking body) does not have the constitutional right to make accounting rules. Even news articles in well-respected business journals added to the fray with
headlines like business winning its battle against SOX's8230; and SEC easing SOX rules's8230;
So where does SOX stand The requirements come from the Sarbanes-Oxley Act passed by Congress, the only entity with the power to change it. In light of widespread corporate accounting
scandals and executive malfeasance, a legislative reversal is highly unlikely. The SEC has stated that it believes the initial cost of compliance was due to unreasonable audit practices
by accounting firms and inflexible accounting rules. In response, the PCAOB recently issued proposed accounting rule changes (dubbed AS5) maintaining SOX requirements but reducing
unnecessary audit work.
Economists agree that the hallmark a strong capital market is its transparency. Adoption of SOX-like legislation in countries like Italy, Japan, and Australia demonstrate the worldwide
desire for transparency. Even London'ss AIM is considering implementing internal control and governance rules due to recent accounting failures in its market.
The Ostrich defense of pretending it doesn'st exist will only aggravate the problem as time goes by. SOX compliance does not have to be expensive or complicated and may actually help
improve company operations. With the deadline fast-approaching, smaller companies need to look beyond the hype and accept that SOX is not going away. The best way to avoid the pain of SOX
is to start complying now.
About the author
Henry Fu is the President of Meridian Management Systems, Inc. His experiences include public accounting with Big 4 accounting firms, internal audit in a Fortune 500 company, and with
providing Sarbanes-Oxley consulting services since the act was first introduced. Mr. Fu has an MBA from Rutgers University and a BS in Economics and Finance from SUNY College at
Buffalo.
About Meridian
Meridian is a provider of risk management solutions and consulting services to public and private companies. Meridian recently announced its partnership with the SC&H Group (an award
winning national provider of CPA, Tax, and Specialty Services) to offer consulting services. Its flagship product is the Meridian compliance software designed to assist companies in
complying with Sarbanes-Oxley regulations. Meridian can be reached at 877-790-0062. Additional information is available at MeridianManagement.com.