Prnewsnow Reach the World NOW

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Methyl Bromide Safe and Necessary Experts Say



It is 20 years after signing the Montreal Protocol banning chlorofluorocarbons, we now recognize that banning methyl bromide was a mistake. Explains Steve Longoria (http://www.aanko.com/) is "essential as fumigant," killing bacteria and fungi. This "helps guarantee an adequate supply of food at reasonable cost." Eliminating methyl bromide would not only decrease the available supply of fruits and vegetables, but the loss of methyl bromide would also result in higher losses post harvest in both fresh fruits, vegetables, as well as grains, and dried fruits and nuts. Farmers would lose export markets as well as domestic sales, since the chemical is used to protect the commodities in transit as well as processing and warehousing.



Methyl bromide also is essential at a time when we must worry about bioterrorism. The chemical kills Anthrax spores, meaning it would play a critical role if the U.S. ever suffers a large-scale Anthrax attack.



Industry and government have spent nearly $200 million dollars to develop an alternative fumigant, without success. Without methyl bromide, crop yields will drop and crop losses will mount.



This is not just a problem in wealthy nations like America. The socialist government of Zimbabwe has complained about the harmful impact of eliminating use of the chemical.



Ironically, man-made supplies account for just one-fourth of the total natural production of methyl bromide, which is released in marshes and oceans. Thus, even eliminating human sources would have only a small impact on total emissions.



The United Nations is hosting an anniversary celebration for the Protocol this week in Montreal. Instead of toasting their handiwork


thus far, the UN delegates should reconsider their approach to methyl bromide.The continued use of the product at 2004 levels poses no real harm to the ozone layer. In the meantime some farmers are protesting having to use an alternative that has a carcinogen warning as part of the label.



As Longoria concludes, "it is important to protect the environment. But people are part of the environment." The rules of the critical exemption use, as written in the Protocol should be followed. This would allow continued use of methyl bromide. You can reach Steve Longoria at steve.longoria@aanko.com.





Contact:


Steve Longoria


415-408-8004


steve.longoria@aanko.com





Prnewsnow Reach the World NOW

↑ Grab this Headline Animator


This article has been robotically scanned and tagged by Prnewsnow with the following search tags. No human manipulation of these tags take place.
| Sales | Floor Covering | |





Last 1000 Articles Submitted XML FEEDS FOR ORGANIZED NEWS